WARNING: THE FOLLOWING EXERCISE IN CREATIVE ACCOUNTING CONSISTS OF BASELESS NUMBERS MASQUERADING AS STATISTICS. TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY AT YOUR OWN RISK - ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO CITE MANORWOODS BLOG IN NEWSPAPERS WITHOUT PROVIDING A LINK OR MY NAME]
Now that the petitions have been successfully file, incorporation is heading to a referendum, most likely early this
summer. The question haunting TOV is guessing how many “no” votes will be
needed to kill incorporation, thereby saving the TOV, the town, the Republic
and truth and justice.
The first order of business is to guess how many Edgies will be vote in a
short notice referendum. Our best
starting point to guesstimate how many will turn out in favor of incorporation
are the incorporation petitions which presented the names of 1,455 registered
voters.
Now come the unfounded assumptions:
Assumption #1: 90% of
the 1,455 actually understood what they were signing and support
incorporation: #1 reduces potential "yes" voters to 1,310.
Assumption #2: The petition signers are motivated and will
vote in the referendum in the same ratio as Edgemont registered voters did in
the recent presidential election at 80%: #2 reduces the petition voters to
1048.
Assumption #3:
Publicity and debate attracts more attention and adds another 10% to the
voter total, resulting in 1,153 votes in favor of incorporation.
So my estimate is 1,153 in favor votes – hold it against me
later. Any Nate Silvers here have a
better plan?
Back to our original question: can incorporation be defeated in a
referendum? If we go with the 1,153
votes in favor prediction, then opponents will need to summon 1,154 voters
(remember that it’s an up or down vote). To reach this total will require a voter turn-out of over 2,300. The premise of the rest of this essay is that a turnout of over 2,300 make defeat of the incorporation referendum plausible.
Are 1,154 “no” votes possible to attain? Let’s look at historic turn-out. In a non-presidential election, the largest
Edgemont turnout we’ve seen in recent years came in November 2010 which
featured Andrew Cuomo’s first bid for governor and a re-election run for US
Senate by Chuck Schumer. That election
brought out 2,449 Edgemont voters, about half of the active registered
voter total. This turnout exceeds our 2,300 threshold and suggests that it is possible for Edgemont voting numbers to reach totals where incorporation could be defeated. Admittedly, however, November turn outs in Edgemont in other off-year elections have usually been closer to 1,400 than 2,300.
But are November general elections even a good comparison? Probably
not because active registered voters are accustomed to turning up election day and easier to mobilize. A better model is a non-November
general election or referendum. For
Edgemont, the best examples are probably school budget elections, which can sometimes attract great attention. In the past several years, school budget
vote turn out in Edgemont has generally been around 600, peaking at just over 700 back in
2011. If we go further back, however, we will a budget vote where an astounding 2,316 voters came
out on June 16 (!), 2005. This was a re-vote
after a previous negative vote in May (when the vote total was 1077). Clearly, Edgemont residents were highly motivated
and energized for that budget vote. Most significantly for our purposes, the 2005 school budget vote shows that it is possible to mobilize Edgemont voters to turn out in numbers in an off-month referendum whereby defeat of the incorporation referendum is conceivable.
Summary: EIC’s 1,455
ballot signers look like an imposing total should incorporation supporters turn
out for the referendum in expected numbers. I estimate that for there to be any chance
to defeat incorporation, overall Edgemont turn-out will have to clear 2,300. To
find a non-general election date where numbers turn-out number reach that
threshold, we have to go back to the highly charged 2005 second school budget
vote. In conclusion, it is plausible that in a highly charged atmosphere, referendum turn-out
numbers could be reached where incorporation could be defeated. But is this possibility likely or even realistic? What do you think?
In that second school board vote, it was over 2 to 1 in favor of the budget. The additional mobilization over normal electoral turnout was overwhelmingly in favor of the schools. If, as likely, the vote to incorporate is seen as protecting the schools, I am predicting at least 2 to 1 in favor of incorporation. If you are aware of anyone accepting bets, please post.
ReplyDeleteIt is important to ask why is Edgemont seeking to incorporate. The EIC has just released a devastating youtube video showing how land use decisions are made in unincorporated Greenburgh. The lackl of local control over zoning and planning have long been a sore issue in Edgemont. The youtube video (which pertains to the Shelbourne case on Underhill Road) goes along way to explain why Edgemont is festooned with lawn signs supporting incorporation.
ReplyDelete