Sunday, January 12, 2014

What does the Fortress Bible settlement mean for Hartsdale?

This past December 17th, the Greenburgh Town Board approved a  $6.5 million payout to settle years of litigation with the Fortress Bible Church.


See: 
http://westchester.lohudblogs.com/2013/12/17/greenburgh-approves-6-5-million-settlement-mount-vernon-congregation
http://westchester.news12.com/news/greenburgh-agrees-to-6-5m-settlement-with-mount-vernon-based-church-1.6633089
http://westfaironline.com/59778/greenburgh-agrees-to-6-5m-settlement-with-church


Stymied by Greenburgh government officials in its attempt to build a church and school on land purchased by the church in Greenburgh, the church had filed suit in federal district court claiming that Greenburgh had violated the church's constitutional rights.  The church prevailed in a decision that was scathing in its appraisal of the conduct of Greenburgh town officials.  The trial court's decision was completely affirmed on appeal.

For the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal's decision, see
http://rluipa-defense.com/docs/Fortress%20Bible%202d%20Cir.pdf

According to the town board and reports, only $1 million of this settlement is covered by the town's insurance.  The remaining balance will have to be funded by the property taxpayers of Greenburgh directly.  This past Thursday night, the Greenburgh town board approved financing $5.5 million of the settlement payout by issuing a bond that will be repaid over ten years.
http://abettergreenburgh.blogspot.com/2014/01/super-majority-passes-amended-amended.html

Repaying the $5.5 million ten year bond's principle and interest will be borne solely by unincorporated Greenburgh property owners (i.e., "TOV" or "town outside villages), which is essentially Fairview, Hartsdale and Edgemont.  According to Bob Bernstein's Greenburgh Update on Facebook, the cost of the settlement to unincorporated homeowners will be about $17 per 1,000 of each home's assessed value.  I  calculated the average assessed value of the 19 homes on my block of Mercer Ave. between Finlay and Lakeview and, according to Bernstein's calculation, these 19 homeowners will pay at least $349 per home to fund the Fortress Bible settlement, presumably paid out over ten years.

 Even though village voters  (i.e., residents of Tarrytown, Irvington, Dobbs Ferry, Hastings, Elmsford and Ardsley) typically deliver close to 40% of the Democratic party primary votes received by board members, villagers will not pay the price of their elected officials' actions on the Fortress Bible matter.   To my understanding, this means that while, for example, Mercer Ave. residents will pay $349 per home to fund the settlement, the one town board member who lives in the villages (Diana Juettner) and who voted (1) in favor of the settlement and (2) that the costs will be borne only by unincorporated property taxpayers, will pay $0 toward the settlement.

I wrote to Greenburgh Councilman Francis Sheehan - who is the sole board member who lives in Hartsdale and will bear personally bear the costs of the settlement - to ask for his explanation of his vote in favor of the settlement and allocating all the costs solely to unincorporated Greenburgh residents.  He gave me permission to post his response:

Dear Mr. Weinfeld:

You may have noticed that the Town Board amended the bond resolution immediately prior to its adoption last night (1/9/14).  The resolution that was before the Town Board was ambiguous as to who would pay the principal and interest.  However, the Town Attorney (who also lives in the unincorporated area) stated at the Wednesday night Town Board meeting that, notwithstanding what the resolution may state, only the Town Outside Villages (TOV) fund would be used to pay the settlement.  In the interest of transparency, the Town Board amended the resolution prior to adoption to remove the ambiguity so the public and the purchasers of the bonds would be more fully and accurately informed.

As both candidates for supervisor, Paul Feiner and Bob Bernstein, agreed during last year's campaign, the Fortress Bible lawsuit is related to land-use/zoning decisions that solely affect property in the unincorporated area (Town Outside Villages) and they further agreed that any settlement related to that land-use issue should therefore be solely charged to the Town Outside Villages (TOV) fund.   The candidates did not agree on much during that campaign but they agreed on that determination, as do I and the other members of the Town Board.  The bond resolution adopted last evening is consistent with that reasoning and that determination.  

Ten days in, it may be a bit late but I wish you a healthy and happy New Year,

Francis Sheehan, Councilman
  Town of Greenburgh



In fairness to Mr. Sheehan (and Mr. Morgan and Mr. Jones), he was not a board member at the time the prejudicial decisions were made that prompted the successful litigation from Fortress Bible Church accusing the town of violating its constitutional rights.  Only Paul Feiner and Diana Juettner remain on the board from that fateful time in the early 2000s.
[correction: Gary writes in that Councilman Morgan lives in unincorporated Greenburgh (North Elmsford) and consequently his property will be subject to increased taxes to pay off the bond. Diana Juettner is the only board member will get away without paying].

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Looking at the 2013 Primary Number: Part II

Which election districts love Paul Feiner the most? Which ones are happy to leave him? Here are Feiner's top 10:
1. ED67 - 92%   Election District 67 lies in the extreme north-east of the town and falls within the Valhalla school district. #67 gave Paul Feiner 81 out of 88 total votes. It is the only unincorporated election district on Feiner's top 10 list (and the only one outside of the river towns).
2. ED9 - 91% Irvington
3. ED4 - 89% Tarrytown
4. ED18 -89% Hastings
5. ED55 -89% Tarrytown
6. ED19 -89% Hastings
7. ED16 -88% Dobbs Ferry
8. (tie) ED14 - 87% Dobbs Ferry
            ED60 - 87% Irvington
10.  ED23 -87% Hastings (Feiner's highest vote total ED with 142 to 21; also his highest vote total in 2007).

Who doesn't like Paul so much? Bernstein won exactly 10 election districts out of 81 in Greenburgh. Not surprisingly most of these are in Edgemont.  Those ten are as follows, in reverse order and listed according to Feiner's percentage:
10.ED75 - 43% - mostly Hartsdale (condos on east side of Central Ave. south from E. Hartsdale Road)
9. ED72 - 42% - Hartsdale (lower manor woods centered on Columbia Ave.)
8. ED29 - 40% - Pocantico SD (smallest of all EDs with only 10 votes total: Paul got 4).
7. ED49 - 37% - Edgemont ( west of Central Ave, south of Ardsley Road intersection)
6. ED51 - 37% - Elmsford SD (neighborhood between Worthington Rd. & Saw Mill, north of Dobbs Ferry Rd)
5. ED70 - 33% - Pretty much all Edgemont (west side of Central Ave. from W. Hartsdale Ave. south to the Underhill Rd intersection)
4. ED69 - 28% - Edgemont (just to the west of #33 and essentially west of Fort Hill Rd. between Underhill and Ardsley Road)
3. ED33 - 18% - Edgemont (along west side of Cental Ave., south of Underhill Road. down to Ardlsey Road)
2. ED34 - 14% - Edgemont (east of Central Ave. & Old Army Rd. and streching along the length of Aqueduct Road corridor Bernstein's home ED and his highest vote ED with 160 to 26).
.. and the district that most dislikes our 22 year incumbent…
1. ED35 - 11% - deep in the heart of Edgemont (mostly east of Central Ave and west of Old Army Rd.), Bernstein received 156 votes and Feiner only 20. Also the worst ED for Feiner against Berger in 2007.

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Looking at the numbers: the 2013 Primary Breakdown

VILLAGE
VOTING DIST.
TOTAL
BERNST
%
FEINER
%
FEINER % in 2007
FEINER % in 2005
TARRYTOWN
1-7, 55, 74, 76
404
   79
20%
     321
79%
       78%
     57%
IRVINGTON
8-11, 60, 79
302
  45
15%
     256
85%
       68%
     41%
DOBBS FERRY
12-17, 58, 65. 80
380
106
28%
     272
72%
       70%
     54%
HASTINGS
18-23, 52, 59
664
102
15%
     558
84%
       78%
     52%
ARDSLEY
24, 25, 53, 54
293
102
35%
    188
64%
       56%
     31%
ELMSFORD
26-28
122
  40
33%
      80
67%
       61%
     68%
2013 TOTALS

2165
474
22%
  1675
77%
       71%
     49%











UG SCHOOL DIST
VOTING DIST.
TOTAL
BERNST.
%
FEINER
%
FEINER % in 2007
FEINER % in 2005
EDGEMONT SD
33-35, 49, 69, 70
868
678
78%
   187
22%
    43%
    34%
HARTSDALE GC
36-41, 56, 57, 66, 71, 72, 75
867
296
34%
   561
65%
    60%
    51%
FAIRVIEW GC
42, 44-46, 61, 63, 64, 78
932
329
35%
   593
64%
    63%
    58%
POCANTICO SD
29, 68
 75
  36
48%
     36
48%
     61%
    58%
VALHALLA SD
47, 48, 67
283
  62
22%
   215
76%
     71%
    64%
ARDSLEY SD (outside village)
32, 43, 50, 62
389
113
29%
   274
70%
     68%
    55%
ELMSFORD SD (outside village)
51, 77, 81
226
 79
35%
   143
63%
     59%
    55%
TARRY/ELM MIX
30
  65
  26
40%
     39
60%
     59%
    73%
IRV/ELM MIX
31
  62
  12
19%
     50
81%
     66%
    60%
ARD/HASTING
73
101
  27
27%
     74
73%
     64%

















2013 UNINC. TOTAL

3878
1668
43%
  2172
56%
     60%
    52%










2013 (BERNSTEIN V. FEINER)

6043
2142
35%
  3847
64%
     
    









2007 (BERGER V. FEINER) 

6683
2192
33%
  4315
65% 

2005 (GREENAWALT             5872    2786     47%   2983   51%                         V. FEINER) Random Observations: Notice how Feiner increased his percentage of the vote in each sizeable community over 2007 (with the glaring exception of Edgemont). Concomitantly, Berger outperformed Bernstein everywhere except Edgemont and the small Pocantico Hills school district precincts. Also note Feiner's dramatic increase in popularity in Irvington and Ardsley villages since 2005. Feiner performed poorly in the villages in 2005 agasinst Bill Greenawalt, but now they are now the bedrock of his support, handing him staggering numbers. The incumbant's increasing strength in Hartsdale (defined here as the Greenburgh Central School district 10530 zip code neighborhoods) is also significant in light of the fact real estate values in Hartsdale have lagged far behind the villages and Edgemont, giving Hartsdale residents particular justification to gripe about taxes and punish officeholders. Feiner paid no attention to Hartsdale-specific issues during the summer campaign, but at the same time Bernstein clearly failed to make any headway in tapping this large resevoir of potentially disaffected voters, where - as we'll see in the next post - Rob Astorino's anti-tax message fared quite well. Four EDs that Berger won that Bernstein lost: ED 11 (s.w. Irvington); ED38 (Hartsdale college corners); ED53 (Arsdley village); ED56 (Hartsdale: essentially Stone Oaks condos)