Tuesday, December 27, 2016

GREENBURGH 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS

VILLAGE
VOTING DIST.
TOTAL
CLINTON
%
TRUMP
%

TARRYTOWN
1-7, 55, 74, 76
5685
4010
71%
    1441
25%
       
     
IRVINGTON
8-11, 60, 79
3692
2655
72%
      853
23%
       
     
DOBBS FERRY
12-17, 58, 65. 80
5286
3610
68%
    1476
28%
       
     
HASTINGS
18-23, 52, 59
4690
3713
79%
     804
17%
       
     
ARDSLEY
24, 25, 53, 54
2447
1711
70%
     654
27%
      
     
ELMSFORD
26-28
1560
1086
70%
     435
28%
       
     
VILLAGE TOTALS

23360
16785
72%
   5663
24%
       
     











TOV SCH DIST
VOTING DIST.
TOTAL
CLINTON
%
TRUMP
%


EDGEMONT SD
33-35, 49, 69, 70
3610
2772
77%
   838
23%
    
    
HARTSDALE GC
36-41, 56, 57 66, 71, 72, 75
5617
3920
70%
  1697
30%
    
   
FAIRVIEW GC
42, 44-46, 61, 63, 64, 78
4765
4019
84%
   624
13%
    
    
POCANTICO SD
29, 68
  642
  403
63%
   210
33%
     
    
VALHALLA SD
47, 48, 67
1723
1236
72%
   430
25%
     
    
ARDSLEY SD (outside village)
32, 43, 50, 62, 73
2979
2124
70%
   757
26%
     
    
ELMSFORD SD (outside village)
51, 77, 81
1464
1047
72%
   377
26%
     
    
EAST TARRY
30
 752
  492
65%
   227
30%
     
   
EAST IRVING 
31
 899
  615
68%
   241
27%
     
    


  

   

     










TOV TOTAL

22451
16628
74%
  5401
24%
     
    

TOWN TOTAL


45811
3341373%11064
24%








  
    
Notes:  Hillary Clinton crushed Donald Trump in the Town of Greenburgh as Clinton took 72.4% compared to Trump's 24%.  Clinton's percentage and vote total (33,413) even surpassed Obama who received a mere 69.2% and 29,359 votes in 2012 and 70.2% and 31,457 votes in the transformative 2008 contest. Greenburgh experienced enormous turnout of nearly 80% of active, registered voters in the 2016 presidential election.  Including third parties, a total of 46,461 ballots were cast - compared to 42,711 in 2012, 45,238 in 2008, 43,311 in 2004 and 41,229 in 2000.  I only have vote totals going back to 2000, but in light of Greenburgh's slowly increasing and rapidly aging population, it's quite possible that Hillary Clinton just received the most votes in a single election in the town's long history.

Amid all this affection for Hillary, who loved her the most?  The village of Hastings-on-Hudson signaled its growing reputation as "Upper West Side North" by voting 79% for Clinton, the highest among the incorporated villages.  The distinction for the most ardent Clinton supporters, however, goes to Fairview - which I define for purposes of this survey as Fairview Fire District within the Greenburgh Central School district.  Fairview gave Clinton 84% of its votes, compared to a stingy 13% for Trump.  Hastings and Fairview confirmed once against their mutual status as Greenburgh's most politically liberal communities which they last demonstrated back in 2013 when they led the town by a wide margin in support for county commissioner candidate Noam Bramson against Rob Astorino.

ED46, consisting of the Fairview neighborhood centered along Manhattan Avenue, demonstrated the greatest fervor for Hillary by giving her 95% of their votes: with Hillary getting 729 votes, compared to just 34 for Trump.  Hillary also received 90%+ in ED81 (TOV Elmsford SD neighborhood north of 287, east of Saw Mill River Road, but incorporating both sides of the Sprain);  ED47 on the north-east edge of Parkway Gardens and split between Greenburgh Central and Valhalla school districts; and ED23 (the north side of Hastings, east of Route 9).

Where did Trump get support, as meager as it may have been? Two small electoral districts largely in the Pocantico Hills School District are the only Greenburgh community where Trump received as much as 30%. Among Greenburgh's 81 individual electoral districts (which are generally designed to include about 1,000 residents, but often vary in size), Trump won 40% in just 3:  45% in ED29 (Greenburgh's smallest district) which includes streets between the Sprain and Knollwood Rd at the far northern end of town; 44% in ED51  north of Dobbs Ferry Road between 87 and Worthington Ave.; and 40% in ED66, which is Poet's Corner south of Secor Road.   Trump received his highest vote total, 275, in Dobbs Ferry's ED13 (Greenburgh's largest ED) in that village's north west corner.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Bizarre Tree Makes Impression on Mercer Ave.

Environmental abstract sculpture?  A venerated Oak spirit for Druid worship?  Or just a crazy job of arborism by Greenburgh DPW?  You decide:





































This mighty Oak suffered severe damage during Storm Sandy - more than 4 years ago.    Con Ed did some emergency trimming to disentangle the shattered branches from wires that knocked out power on our street for almost two weeks.  Understandably not focused on aesthetics at the time, Con Ed left behind a scarred and damaged, and still massive tree.  After more than 4 years, the Town of Greenburgh DPW took notice of the tree, and after two half-days of work this past week left behind the trimming job pictured above.  DPW has informed the property owner on which this "town tree" stands that it will return sometime in the Spring to finish the job of cutting it down to grade level.  The reason given for not finishing the job now was something about not damaging the lawn.  The tree looms over my property and I'm just as baffled by the DPW's response at my next door neighbor.

Monday, October 31, 2016

The Hartsdale School District: myths and facts; Part 1: Population Boom and Racism


The Legend of the Hartsdale School District 
Deep in the inner recesses of the consciousness of Hartsdale residents lingers a vague, vestigial memory of a long defunct Hartsdale school district. Legends surround this school district, distorted by a haze of misinformation.  Yet it is true that long ago, Hartsdale did have its own compact school district serving the neighborhoods of Manor Woods, College Corners, Windsor Park and Ridge Road.

The following discussion is intended to dispel common misunderstanding by presenting accurate information about the Hartsdale School District and its demise fifty years ago.  This first posting will address the demographic transformation of previously small, sleepy school districts in the 1950s, and the racism that plagued the county and shaped changes to come.

Population Boom
When looking back to the post-WWII development of the Town of Greenburgh school districts, the crucial factor is the population explosion of the 1950s.  Between 1950 and 1960, Greenburgh grew 60%, from 47,500 to 76,000 residents (Greenburgh grew another 12% in the 1960s to reach 86,000 residents by 1970, and has increased very little in the subsequent 50+ years).  As an example of this dramatic population boom, registered voters in both Ardsley and Fairview doubled from just 1950 to 1954.  

Inevitably, school districts saw their enrollments explode along with the general population.  For example, Fairview schools (Greenburgb #8) saw the number of students quadruple in 15 years, from under 600 to over 2700.  This dramatic growth precipitated major changes in previously tiny school districts, many with only a few hundred students.  Before the population growth of the 1950s, most Greenburgh school districts were still too small to support their own high schools.  There were no high schools in the unincorporated school districts:  Greenville (or "Edgemont") customarily sent its 11th and 12th graders to Scarsdale High School.  Hartsdale sent 10th, 11th and 12th graders to White Plains High School (as did Fairview).   

The old Greenburgh school districts were identified by their numbers:  Ardsley was #5, Edgemont #6, Hartsdale #7, Fairview #8, Elmsford #9, etc.   Edgemont, Ardsley and Elmsford schools have basically retained the same borders but housing developments have taken over the farms and undeveloped land which had once comprised much of those districts' property. Fairview #8 included the remainder of the modern Greenburgh Central School District neighborhoods: Poet's Corner, Orchard Hill, Fairview, Parkway Gardens, Juniper Hill, etc.    


Racism's Persistent and Ugly Legacy
In addition to enormous population growth, the second important factor to consider in the development of the Greenburgh school systems is blatant racial segregation. Racism runs deep in Westchester County and there is not space to go into detail here.  In the 19th century, Westchester County, like New York City,  expressed no sympathy for emancipation or black civil rights.  Westchester opposed the Civil War and voted against Presidents Lincoln and Grant. The county staunchly supported the Democratic Party until almost the end of the century.

The "Second" Ku Klux Klan," revived in the late 1910s, was active in Westchester County until dying out by the mid-1930s.  KKK organizations existed in Peekskill and Port Chester with small affiliated cells in Mount Vernon, Mount Pleasant, Yonkers, New Rochelle and White Plains.  In Greenburgh, only Hastings is reported as having a KKK cell. (Scarsdale Inquirer, Dec. 31, 1928; https://labs.library.vcu.edu/klan)  Cross burnings appear intermittently in newspaper reports of the time, although it is not clear how many were KKK directed as opposed to KKK mimicry.  The New York Amsterdam News reported in May 1932 that a large cross was burned on a hill overlooking Fairview (I'm guessing this means Juniper Hill) in response to the election of Reverend Louis Hughes as the first African American member of Fairview #8's Board of Education.  [New York Amsterdam News, May 18, 1932].

Racism was not relegated to shadowy, secret, social groups.  One of the most insidious expressions of racism, whose legacy shapes the county today, was the establishment of restrictive covenants.  Restrictive covenants on real estate deeds prohibited a wide range of "undesirables" from owning residential property in contravention of community prejudices.  One study showed that in Westchester County, at least  50% of developments of 20 or more houses had restrictive covenants (Journal of Land & Public Utility Economics, 1947).

Restrictive covenants were most notoriously wielded to exclude blacks and Jews from various suburban communities.  The barriers against Jewish home ownership had begun to crumble in most places in the late 1940s, but even after the US Supreme Court barred restrictive covenants in 1948, the exclusion of blacks continued through the collusion of mortgage lenders, banks, federal government home ownership programs, real estate brokers and local insistence.  As a consequence, black families found very limited opportunity for home ownership and were restricted to narrow, geographic areas.  With no realistic option to pick up and leave, blacks renters could be exploited by landlords who charged disproportionately high rents and who had little incentive to improve inadequate properties.  Black home buyers too were limited in terms of choice and, often denied access to government-backed mortgage programs, frequently entered into disadvantageous home purchase contracts.  Often, too, black homeowners and renters lacked political leverage to demand that municipalities invest in infrastructure in their neighborhoods. As a result, even in suburbs, "ghetto" or "slum" conditions became notorious.  [For background, see Richard Rosenstein's The Color of Law http://a.co/d/2MEMLdU]

In Greenburgh, the legacy of racial housing restrictions became obvious.  Parkway Gardens, in a largely isolated section of the north-east corner of the Town, was developed and marketed starting in the 1940s as a black suburban neighborhood of small homes on limited parcels of land.  Fairview- Manhattan Park, also mostly African American, and pre-dating Parkway Gardens, remained largely unpaved and subject to flooding and abject conditions.  In the 1950s and 1960s, local newspapers reported for their white readership about Fairview's "slum" conditions as landlords allowed properties to deteriorate and overcrowding persisted while the town neglected infrastructure.

In contrast to the largely African American neighborhoods of Fairview and Parkway Gardens, nearby Hartsdale and Greenville/Edgemont, also within unincorporated Greenburgh, were almost entirely white.  The boundaries that divided school districts may have been invisible, but posed an insurmountable racial barrier.  One report observed that in the mid-1960s, Hartsdale's school enrollment of almost 900 students included only one African American child.  In late-1950s Edgemont, the appearance of a black transfer student from Yonkers was remembered as a notable and singular event.   Ardsley schools were only "integrated" in 1965 when a teenager from South Carolina was brought north to live with a white Ardsley family as part of an educational program.   https://patch.com/new-york/tarrytown/first-african-american-integrate-school-1965.  Thus, through the late-1960s, Ardsley (and Edgemont and Hartsdale) educated essentially no children from unincorporated Greenburgh's thriving African American community.  Nearly all of Greenburgh's black children were enrolled in the Fairview #8 school district where, as of the early 1960s, they comprised almost 1/3 of the students.

In the next posting, I'll describe the school merger mania of the 1950s and 60s and the series of events that doomed Hartsdale's school district to extinction.


Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Greenburgh's Changing Demographics: will political representation keep apace?

Summary: Greenburgh's slow population growth over recent decades masks (i) an aging population but also (ii) significant demographic shifts.
Takeaway: Changes in the Town's composition are not reflected in the political establishment, but the times they are a changin' (someday).

I. Slow: The 2000 and 2010 censuses report that Greenburgh's population grew by 1,636 residents (1.9%) during a decade when, by comparison, Westchester County grew by 3%, New York State and New York City each grew by 2.1% and the US by 9.7%.   It might be surmised that growth is constrained by limited new housing opportunities but, surprisingly, the Town saw an increase of 4% in housing units (from 34,084 units in 2000 to 35,452  unit in  2010) in a decade when the population grew by less than one-half that rate.  Who is filling all that new housing?

II. Old:  Along with the slow growth, Greenburgh is rapidly aging:  the median age increased in one decade from 39.7 to 42.8 (up to 43.2 in the 2014 Census estimate).  This is much older than the New York State median age of 38 in 2010.

III. Diverse:   Note: Tracing racial and ethnic changes using the census is not simple. New York's Department of Education divides students into (1) Black or African American," (2) "Hispanic or Latino,"  (3) "Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander," (4) "White," and (5) "Multiracial."  The US Census, however, does not divide the population so conveniently (and misleadingly?).  Instead, the Census recognizes Latino or Hispanic status as an ethnicity, not a racial category such as black or white. The census, however, does list "races" both with and without Latin/Hispanic individuals.  Below, I'm using the "non-Hispanic" racial categories in order to correlate later with school district population numbers.

Comparing the 2000 and 2010 censuses reveals Greenburgh's demographic trends:

A.     Ethnic Latino/Hispanic Population: The census shows rapid growth in individuals identified ethnically as Latino or Hispanic from 7,825 (9%) in 2000 up to 12,366 (14%) in 2010.  This is an increase of 4,541 individuals or 58% in ten years.  Latin/Hispanic growth was broad-based, taking place in just about every village and school district (e.g., almost all Greenburgh school districts saw their percentage of Latino students double during the decade). Greenburgh's Latin population is diverse with the largest subgroup listing Puerto Rico as place of origin (21%), followed by Mexico (14%) and then Ecuador and the Dominican Republic (each about 11.5%). 

As far as the broad census “racial” categories of white, black and Asian, it almost useless to use exact numbers from the census because of evolving definitions (e.g., multi racial) and the wide diversity within each such artificial category (including, of course, Latino/Hispanic). (Note: the schools handle these categories differently.).  Nevertheless, a few trends can be identified:

B.    Greenburgh’s Asian population (a nonsensical category that includes people with such diverse origins as Indian, China, the Philippines, etc.,)  rose about 20% during the 2000s decade, numbering 9,155 or 10.4% of Greenburgh's population in 2010 (compared to US: 4.7%).  Unlike the Latin population growth which occurred throughout Greenburgh, the Asian population growth increase took place primarily in the Edgemont and Ardsley school districts.   

C.    Greenburgh’s Black (non-Hispanic) population dropped 5.6% from 10,993 in 2000 to 10,377 (11.7% of the Town total) in 2010. 

D.  The non-Hispanic white population fell significantly (6.7%)  from 58,450 (67%) in 2000 to 54,539 (62%) in 2010.   (US: 63.7%/ 2014: 62.8%)

E. The multi-racial ("two or more races")category rose slightly from 2,251 in 2000 to 2,404 in 2010.

Some observations about Greenburgh's changing demographics:
1. Poverty:  Town residents living in poverty grew from 3,324 (3.9%) in 2000 to 4,156 (4.7%) in 2014 Census estimate.  This is a concerning 25% growth in the number of impoverished people. 

2.  Voting:  active registered voters grew rom 2009: 57,069  to 2016: 58,479.  Democracy is alive and well in Greenburgh, but....

3.  Representation:  almost 25% of Greenburgh's population is Latin or Asian.  Are these populations fairly represented in town government and leadership?  Both population groups look to continue increasing.  Are changes in political representation coming? 

Thursday, September 15, 2016

No truth to grisly whisperings at Hartsdale Train Station

Speculation abounds regarding the true nature of the construction project at the Hartsdale train station's "De Santi" Plaza.  Rumors began to spread after workers apparently fled the site earlier this week and have not returned.  Some have wondered whether obscure ancient rites gone awry under the garish light of this week's full moon terrified the crew.  Passers-by then began to observe a vague resemblance between the in-process plaza, purportedly designed to display a Veterans Memorial, and altars devoted by the ancients to human and animal sacrifices.

We believe, however, that these ominous portents are merely coincidences.  We've found no evidence - as we've heard suggested - that the Town Council members will reveal themselves at the plaza dedication as shaman-priests of a ghastly mythical spirit whose unquenchable thirst can only be sated with human blood. Admittedly, the throats of random, unsuspecting passengers alighting at train station would provide a convenient and abundant harvest, but such rituals have gone out of favor in Greenburgh in living memory.
Finally, our inquiries have found no evidence that the retaining walls will be inscribed with the timeless, unspeakable summons to the horrific demigod, Cthulhu,   "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"




HARTSDALE STATION PLAZA "MEMORIAL" 9/15/16
SACRIFICIAL HIGH ALTAR - PETRA

MONTE ALBAN - ALTAR, OAXACA, MEXICO

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Fairview in the 1950s: An African American Neighborhood Endures Urban Renewal


Reading through newspaper accounts of Greenburgh in the 1940s through 1970s is startling. Unlike the Greenburgh of the 2000s when we complain about taxes, and argue over whether or not to build access roads to shopping plazas or battle against the location of assisted living complexes, the Greenburgh of previous decades confronted profound questions of planning and race.  The issues that most energized residents were (1) proposals to merge school districts amid rapid population growth and the urgent need to build new school facilities; (2)( plans for urban renewal ("slum clearance") of parts of historically African-American neighborhoods in Fairview,  and the concomitant zoning and placement of public housing,; and (3) the impact of construction of the Cross-Westchester Expressway (Rt. 287).  Decisions made in the 1950s profoundly shape the Town of Greenburgh today.

To illustrate the impact of just one of these many issues - which appear to me to dwarf in import, drama, and real impact on individual lives anything the town has confronted in recent years - here are maps showing the consequences of urban renewal on the historically African American central neighborhoods of Fairview.


1.  1930 Map of Central Fairview

In the 1950s, the grey area on bottom left of the map was deemed by the Town as "substandard" housing and leveled as part of urban renewal effort in cooperation with federal and state authorities and approved by the Town Council amid litigation and dispute.  This centrally located neighborhood, between the major thoroughfares of Tarrytown Road and Dobbs Ferry Road, however, was not replaced with new housing at the same location.  Instead, the African American residents of this area could find 131 units of new public housing built on the Heyer Farm property one-half mile to the north-east beyond the barrier of the Cross Westchester Expressway (now 287) that was also completed in 1960. At the same time, the Heyer Farm property (pink area in upper right of map) was zoned for multi family units stretching north-south from Old Tarrytown Road (northernmost road on map down along the west margin of the Heyer property).   The lettering across the north-central portion of the map "White Plains Parkway" is the current day route of Rt. 287.


2.  Central Fairview Today

Central Fairview today (googlemaps.com).  Note: 1. Rt. 287 bifurcates and dominates the neighborhood; 2.  the clearance (i.e., leveling) of neighborhoods between Tarrytown Rd. and Dobbs Ferry Rd. pursuant to "urban renewal" and replacement by a shopping plaza and parking lots; 3.  The placement of Greenburgh's largest public housing development - the 131 unit state site along the west edge of the old Heyer Farm property between Old Tarrytown Road and the highway 287 (where the "Greenburgh Housing Authority" marker appears).  An additional 30 low rise "senior" federal public units at Manhattan and Florence Ave. on the south side of the highway were also built in 1960.  Notably, the designers of Greenburgh's public housing appear to have pioneered low-rise in place of the infamous high-rise "projects" typically built in the mid-20th century. 

3.  Close up African American neighborhood between Tarrytown Rd. and Dobbs Ferry Rd. cleared (i.e., destroyed under the Greenburgh "urban renewal" program) in late 1950s.  1930 map:
Grey neighborhood on left side (Columba, Vanderbilt, Roosevelt and Lincoln Aves). were first leveled as part of urban renewal.  The rest of the Tarrytown/Dobbs Ferry road angle neighborhood (Meadow St., Spring St. and Warren Ave south of Tarrytown Road) was later eliminated to make room for the current shopping plaza.

4. Current appearance of same area:
The 1950s African American neighborhood south of Tarrytown Road has been replaced by a shopping plaza  (K-mart, DSW, Home Goods, Modells) and parking lots.  Housing that may have been "substandard," but centrally located, has been replaced by public housing units well out of the sight and mind of the general public.



It is convenient and maybe a bit too easy to draw conclusions when confronted by these maps. Urban renewal, or "slum clearance" as it was commonly referred to in the 1950s, may have indeed been inspired by sincere, progressive motives. The implementation, however, of this possibly idealistic plan included leveling of a highly visible African American neighborhood located along the central artery of Tarrytown Road concomitant with the establishment of public housing  in an undesirable area flanking the newly constructed highway and out of sight of the main local thoroughfare.  Considering that in the late 1950s and early 1960s, African Americans had very limited housing options in Greenburgh, New York (e.g., fewer than a total of 10 African American children attended the Town's Edgemont, Ardsley and Hartsdale School Districts in the early 1960s), it may also be inferred that the Town had devised a plan to permanently relegate African American to the margins of the highway in a perpetual "urban ghetto,"  that was well removed from the major local roadways.